Effect of Salinity Stress on the Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Peppermint under Greenhouse Condition

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abdul Wase Tajzadah
Sadegh Mousavifard
Ihsanullah Akramzoi
Najafgholi Hossein Mirzaei
Nejad Abdolhossein Rezaei

Abstract

Peppermint is a rich source of valuable compounds with therapeutic, coloring, preservative and other uses for humans. Peppermint is used in food, perfumery and medicine all over the world. Higher plants experience salt stress due to an excessive buildup of sodium chloride; salinity impacts plants through osmotic stress and toxicity. Salinity impacts every major activity in plants, including growth, photosynthesis, lipid metabolism, protein synthesis, energy production, and germination through biomass and seed formation. The experiment was carried out in the research farm of agriculture faculty of Lorestan University, Iran. The aim of the current research was to examine the effect of different levels of salinity (0, 50 and 100 mM) on the morphological and physiological characteristics of peppermint in the greenhouse. The result showed that salinity stress at 50 and 100 millimole (mM), decreased plant height (11.76%, 23.53%), number of leaves (25.11%, 33.92%), leaf surface (24.76%, 56.37%), crown diameter (14.15%, 25.47%), root length (20.61%, 31.58%), leaf fresh weight (14.47%, 30.47%), leaf dry weight (1.16%, 12.69%), fresh weight of stem (10.78%, 21.11%), dry weight of stem (16.32%, 37.76%), chlorophyll a (46.08% and 61.09%), Chlorophyll b (32.48% and 41.65%), total chlorophyll (40.84% and 53.59%) and carotenoid (34.67% and 67.02%) compared to the control conditions respectively. Hence, increase in salinity concentration at 50 and 100 mM, increased the amount of malondialdehyde (MDA) (37.06% and 73.63%), leaf proline (301.50% and 382.09%) and essential oil (100.40% and 80.32% compared to control. The results of this study showed that, the salinity stress had a significant effect on the morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of peppermint. The results showed that, increases in the salinity stress, significantly increased the amount of electrolyte leakage, production of essential oil, malondialdehyde and proline. Moreover, increase salinity levels in irrigation water, caused reduction in growth characteristics of peppermint. It is to be concluded that, Peppermint is a semi-salt resistant plant, cultivation of peppermint in the medium saline soil is recommended.

Keywords

Greenhouse, Morphological Characteristics, Peppermint, Salinity Stress, Physiological Characteristics

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Tajzadah, A. W., Mousavifard , S. ., Akramzoi, I., Mirzaei, N. H., & Rezaei, N. A. (2024). Effect of Salinity Stress on the Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Peppermint under Greenhouse Condition. Nangarhar University International Journal of Biosciences, 3(01), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.70436/nuijb.v3i01.153

References

  1. Acosta-Motos, J.R. Ortuño, M.F. Bernal-Vicente, A. Diaz-Vivancos, P. Sánchez-Blanco, M.J. Hernández, J.A.
  2. (2017).Plant responses to salt stress: adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy 7, 18.
  3. Ashrafi, N. Rezainejad, A. (2016). Effect of irrigation water salinity on morphological, physiological and
  4. biochemical characteristics of two varieties of lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum). Journal of water research in agriculture. B. V, (30). Number 3. Pages 373-386.
  5. Ashraf, M. Tufail, M. (1995). Variation in salinity tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annum L.). Journal of
  6. Agronomy and Crop science. V (166). Issue, 5. Pages 351-362.
  7. Askary, M. Talebi, S.M. Amini, F. and Bangan, A.B. (2016). Effects of stress on foliar trichomes plasticity in
  8. Mentha piperita. Nusantara Biosci. 8 (1): 32-38.
  9. Azarnivand, H. M, Qoorbani. (2016). Investigating the effect of sodium chloride on the germination of two
  10. pasture species. Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Pasture and Desert Research in Iran. V (4).
  11. Number 3. Pages 358-352.
  12. Croteau, R.B. Ringer, K.L. Davis, E.M. and Wildung, M.R. (2005). (¬¬¬¬-)-Menthol biosynthesis and molecular
  13. genetics. Naturwissenschaften. 92: 562-577.
  14. Fleming, W.C. (2004). The review of natural products. 1th ed. USA: Facts and Comparosons; 702-9.
  15. Gill S.S. and Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in
  16. crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48: 909-930.
  17. Good, A. and Zaplachiniski, S. (1994). The effects of drought on free amino acid accumulation and protein
  18. synthesisin Brassica napus. Physiologia Plantarum. 90: 9-14.
  19. Heydari Sharif Abad, H. (2001). Plant and saltiness. Publications of the country's forests and pastures research
  20. institute, Tehran, 24 page 199.
  21. Keifer, M.D.D. Ulbricht, C. Rae Abrams, P.T. Ethan Basch, P.D. Giese, M.D.N. Giles, M.S.M. and et al.,
  22. (2007). Peppermint (Mentha piperita): An evidencebased systematic review by the Natural Standard
  23. Research Collaboration. J. Herb. Pharmacother. 7: 91-143.
  24. Kumar, P. A. and Bandhu. (2005). Salt Tolerance and Salinity effects on Plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ.
  25. Safety 60: 324- 349.
  26. Kummar, S. Matta Reddy, G. and Sudhakar, C. (2003). NaCl effects on proline metabolism in two high yielding
  27. genotypes of mulberry with contrasting salt tolerance. Plant Science. 165: 1245-1251.
  28. Liang, Y. C. Q. Chen, Q. Liu, Zhang, W. H. and R. X. Ding. (2003). Exogenous silicon (Si) increases
  29. antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Plant Physiology. 160: 1157–1164.
  30. Mckay, D.L. and Blumberg, J.B. (2006). A Review of the Bioactivity and Potential Health Benefits of
  31. Peppermint Tea (Mentha pippermint L.). Phytother. Res. 20: 619 – 633.
  32. Mirmohammadi maibody, A.M. and Qara Yazy, B. (2002). Salt stress and Physiological aspects of plant
  33. breeding. Publishing Centre, University of Technology.
  34. Mu Aye, M. Thanda Aung, H. Armijos, C. (2019). A Review on Phytochemistry, Medicinal properties and
  35. Pharmacological Activities 15 selected Myanmar Medicinal Plants. Molecules. 24(2), 293.
  36. Munns, R. and Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of Salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant BIOL. 59, 651 -681.
  37. Munns, R. (2005). Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytologist. 167 (3): 645–663.
  38. Parida, A.K. and Das, A.B. (2005). Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and
  39. Environmental Safety. 60: 324-349.
  40. Parvaiz, A. and Satyawati, S. (2008). Salt Stress and Photo-biochemical responses of Plants. Plant Soil and
  41. Environment, 54: 89-99.
  42. Rita, P. and Animesh, D.K. (2011). An updated overview on peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). IRJP. 2011; 2
  43. (8): 1-10.
  44. Ritchie, S.W. and A.D. Hanson. (1990). Leaf water content and gas exchange parameters of two wheat
  45. genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Science. 30:105-111.
  46. Saddiq, M.S. Afzal, I. Basra, S.M.A. Iqbal, S. and Ashraf, M. (2020). Sodium exclusion affects seed yield and
  47. physiological traits of wheat genotypes grown under salt stress. Journal of Soil Science and Plant
  48. Nutrition. 20: 3. 1442-1456.
  49. Savant, N.K. Korndorfer, G.H. Datnoff, L.E. and G.H. Snyder. (1999). Silicon nutrition and sugarcane
  50. production: a review. Journal Plant Nutrition. 22:1853–1903.
  51. Shani, U. and Dudly, L. M. (2001). Field studies of crops response to water and salt stress”. Soil Science Society
  52. of America J. 65: 1522 – 1528.
  53. Singh, S.K. Sharma, H.C. Goswami, A.M. Datta, S.P. Singh, S.P. (2000). In vitro growth and leaf composition
  54. of grapevine cultivars as affected by sodium chloride. Biol. Plant. 43, 283-286.
  55. Sofa, A. Dichio, B. Xiloyannis, C. Masia, A. (2004). Effects of different irradiance levels on some antioxidant
  56. enzymes and on malondealdehyde content during rewatering in olive tree. Plant Sciences. 166(2), 293-
  57. Sreenivasulu, N. Sopory, S. K. and Kavi Kishor, P. B. (2007). Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of abiotic
  58. stress tolerance in plants by genomic approaches. Gene 388: 1-13.
  59. Torres- Netto, A. E. Compostrinill, J. G. Oliveiral and O. K. Yananishi. (2002). Portable chlorophyll meter for
  60. quantification on photosynthetic pigments, nitrogen and the possible use foe assessment of the
  61. photochemical process in Carica papaya. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 14: 205-210.
  62. Turner, G.W. Gershenzon, J. and Croteau, R.B. (2000). Development of Peltate Glandular Trichomes of
  63. Peppermint. Plant Physio. 2000; 124: 665- 679.
  64. Tyler, V.E. Brady, L.R. and Robbers, J.E. (1988). Pharmacognosy. Lea Febiger. Philadelphia. Pa. USA. pp: 27-
  65. Volkmar, K. M. Y. Hu. and H. Steppuhn. (1998). Physiological responses of plants to salinity. Can. J. Plant.
  66. Sci. 78:19-27.
  67. Wang, W.B. Kim, Y.H. Lee, H.S. Kim, K.Y. Deng, X.P. and S.S. Kwak. (2009). Analysis of antioxidant
  68. enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem.
  69. : 570 577.
  70. Zhang, J. Jia, W. Yang, J. and Ismail, A. M. (2006). Role of ABA integrating Plant responses to drought and
  71. Salt Stresses. Field Crop Research. 97: 111-119.