Effect of Protective Covering on Physicochemical Properties of Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 11, 2024
https://doi.org/10.70436/nuijb.v3i01.152
Download
PDF 42
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 3 No. 01 (2024): March

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rahimullah Himatkhwah
Sher Mohammad Wafa
Qudratullah Ehsan
Mohammad Sadiq Salihi

Abstract

The study was conducted at Fruit Research Farm Department of Fruit Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during the 2018 and 2019 fruiting seasons. The experiment was conducted on 7-year-old own-rooted vines of Perlette, Flame Seedless, Superior Seedless, and Punjab Purple grapes varieties, with spacing of 4x4 m2 between rows and plants. The experiment consisted of 2 treatment combinations (T1 = protective covering, T2=open field condition) laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications. The data was analyzed for cluster weight, cluster size, total soluble solids, total sugar, acidity, TSS: acid ration, and total anthocyanins. Maximum mean cluster weight (324.7g in 2018 and 333.5g in 2019), cluster length (17cm in 2018 and 16.7cm in 2019), cluster breadth (9.5cm in 2018 and 9.3cm in 2019), TSS (18.33% in 2018 and 18.17% in 2019), total sugar (14.1% in 2018 and 13.5% in 2019), TSS/acid ratio (28.3 in 2018 and 28.4 in 2019) and total anthocyanin contents (47.95mg/100 gm pulp in 2018 and 48.77mg/100 gm pulp in 2019) were recorded in grape varieties grown under permanent protective covering, while the higher acidity (0.68% in 2018 and 0.66% in 2019) was found in grape varieties grown in open condition in both the seasons. All of these parameters, except for acidity, were minimal in grape varieties grown under open field conditions.

Keywords

Chemical characteristics, Grapes, Open filed condition, Protective covering, Physical characteristics

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Himatkhwah, R., Wafa, S. M., Ehsan, Q., & Salihi, M. S. (2024). Effect of Protective Covering on Physicochemical Properties of Grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Nangarhar University International Journal of Biosciences, 3(01), 09–16. https://doi.org/10.70436/nuijb.v3i01.152

References

  1. Berli, F. J., Fanzone, M., Piccoli, P., & Bottini, R. (2011). Solar UV-B and ABA are involved in phenol metabolism of Vitis vinifera L. increasing biosynthesis of berry skin polyphenols. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(9), 4874-4884.
  2. Chavarria, G., Santos, H. P. D., Zanus, M. C., Marodin, G. A. B., & Zorzan, C. (2011). Plastic cover use and its influences on physical-chemical characteristics in must and wine. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 33, 809-815.
  3. Coban, H. (2007). Effects of plastic covering on yield, physical and chemical characteristics of some table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Asian Journal of Chemistry, 19(5), 4052.
  4. Conceição, M. A. F., & Marin, F. R. (2009). Microclimate conditions inside an irrigated vineyard covered with a plastic screen. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 31, 423-431.
  5. El-Saeed, H. M., Elwahed, M. A., Abouziena, H. F., & El-Desoki, E. R. (2015). Changes the microclimate using some protection treatments for early grape production in south of Egypt. Changes, 8(9), 27-36.
  6. Fanizza, G., & Ricciardi, L. (1991). The effect of vineyard overhead plastic sheet covering on some morphological and physiological characteristics in the table grape cv. Regina dei Vigneti (Vitis vinifera L.).
  7. FAO. (2012). Major Fruits and Vegetables producing Countries in the World (2010-2011). Rome, Italy.
  8. Furukawa, Y., Kataoka, T., Shimomura, M., & Ogata, T. (1990). PRODUCTIVITY OF HIGH DENSITY PEACH ORCHARD USING A FREE ROOTSTOCK (PRUNUS PERSICA THUNB.). Peach, XXIII IHC 315, 97-102.
  9. Júnior, M. J. P., Hernandes, J. L., Souza Rolim, G. D., & Blain, G. C. (2011). Microclimate and yield of'Niagara Rosada'grapevine grown in vertical upright trellis and" Y" shaped under permeable plastic cover overhead. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 33(SPE1), 511-518.
  10. Li, X. X., He, F., Wang, J., Li, Z., & Pan, Q. H. (2014). Simple rain-shelter cultivation prolongs accumulation period of anthocyanins in wine grape berries. Molecules, 19(9), 14843-14861.
  11. NHB (2018). Indian Horticulture Data base. National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture Government of India. www. nhb. gov. in.
  12. Rana, G., Katerji, N., Introna, M., & Hammami, A. (2004). Microclimate and plant water relationship of the “overhead” table grape vineyard managed with three different covering techniques. Scientia Horticulturae, 102(1), 105-120.
  13. Sindhu, S. and Radhai Sri, S. (2015). Versatile Health Benefits of Active Components of Grapes (Vitis vinifera). Indian J. Res., 5(4): 289-91.
  14. Souza, C. R. D., Mota, R. V. D., Dias, F. A. N., Melo, E. T. D., Pimentel, R. M. D. A., Souza, L. C. D., & Regina, M. D. A. (2015). Physiological and agronomical responses of Syrah grapevine under protected cultivation. Bragantia, 74, 270-278.
  15. Tangolar, S. G., Tangolar, S., Blllr, H., Ozdemir, G., Sabir, A., & Cevlk, B. (2007). The effects of different irrigation levels on yield and quality of some early grape cultivars grown in greenhouse. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences.
  16. Vool, E., Ratsep, R., Karp K., Bachman, K. and Moor, U. (2014). The quality of grapes in open and protected cultivation conditions. Proceedings of International conference ‘Horticulture in quality and culture of life, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry BRNO. pp 839-46.
  17. Wittwer, S. H., & Castilla, N. (1995). Protected cultivation of horticultural crops worldwide. HortTechnology, 5(1), 6-24.
  18. Yang, J., Martinson, T. E., & Liu, R. H. (2009). Phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activities of wine grapes. Food Chemistry, 116(1), 332-339.