Study and Mechanism of Magnetocardiography (MCG) Device and its Comparison to Electrocardiography (ECG) in Heart Diseases

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.70436/nuijb.v2i03.65
Download
PDF 298
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 2 No. 03 (2023): September

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Bashirullah Safi
Fazal Rahman Mukhlis Safi
Abdul Rabi Atif

Abstract

Background: Magnetocardiography device is the best tool for diagnosing heart diseases in a more accurate way. This device is related to the superconductors and squid. In Afghanistan there has been no research conducted about it. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the structure, activity and information related to the application of magnetocardiography theoretically.
Materials and Methods: The research design for this study is reflective in nature, utilizing a review research approach. This involves examining existing literature, reports, and empirical studies published in peer review journals about the structure and mechanism of the magnetocardiography device and its comparison with electrocardiography. The obtained information was summarized, compared the previous and current articles, and the results obtained are placed here.
Findings: Today, in the medical field, magnetocardiography is an advanced device, which diagnoses diseases in shortage of time accurately and quickly. In addition, the magnetocardiography device used to diagnose heart diseases has very few negative effects on human body against other devices.
Conclusion: Calculation of this magnetic field from the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) is the only powerful magnetic sensor to measure human biological magnetic activity so far. A comparison of conventional sensor arrangements (MCG/ECG) and optimized sensor arrangements were made by determining the slope of individual values, and its application for heart diseases very effectively. MCG is used in the imaging of patients for whom the time required is much less than the time of ECG measurement.

Keywords

Electrocardiography, Magnetocardiography, Superconductivity, Squid

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Safi, B., Mukhlis Safi, F. R., & Atif, A. R. (2023). Study and Mechanism of Magnetocardiography (MCG) Device and its Comparison to Electrocardiography (ECG) in Heart Diseases. Nangarhar University International Journal of Biosciences, 2(03), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.70436/nuijb.v2i03.65

References

  1. Arai, K., Kuwahata, A., Nishitani, D., Fujisaki, I., Matsuki, R., Nishio, Y., & Iwasaki, T. (2022). Millimetre-scale magnetocardiography of living rats with thoracotomy. Communications Physics, 5(1), 1-1.
  2. Bhat, V. R., Sengottuvel, S., Swain, P. P., Anitha, H., & Gireesan, K. (2023). Visualization of Cardiac Vectors using Electrocardiography and Magnetocardiography. IETE Journal of Research, 69(1), 220-231.
  3. Chakeres, D. W., & de Vocht, F. (2005). Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systems. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 87(2-3), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.08.012
  4. Clarke, J., & Braginski, A. I. (2004). The SQUID handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 277-280). Weinheim: Wiley-Vch.-
  5. Douine, B., Berger, K., & Ivanov, N. (2021). Characterization of High-Temperature Superconductor Bulks for Electrical Machine Application. Materials, 14(7), 1636.
  6. Fioranelli, M., Roccia, M. G., Beesham, A., Flavin, D., & Shoorvazi, S. (2022). The Physical Origin of Waves in Magnetocardiography Technique and their Applications in Imaging. NeuroQuantology, 20(5), 886-891.
  7. Fish, R. M., & Geddes, L. A. (2009). Conduction of electrical current to and through the human body: a review. Eplasty, 9.
  8. Gubser, S. S., Herzog, C. P., Pufu, S. S., & Tesileanu, T. (2009). Superconductors from superstrings. Physical review letters, 103(14), 141601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.141601
  9. Hänninen, H., Takala, P., Mäkijärvi, M., Montonen, J., Korhonen, P., Oikarinen, L., & Toivonen, L. (2001). Recording locations in multichannel magnetocardiography and body surface potential mapping sensitive for regional exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Basic research in cardiology, 96(4), 405-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003950170049
  10. Jensen, K., Skarsfeldt, M. A., Stærkind, H., Arnbak, J., Balabas, M. V., Olesen, S. P., & Polzik, E. S. (2018). Magnetocardiography on an isolated animal heart with a room-temperature optically pumped magnetometer. Scientific reports, 8(1), 1-9.
  11. Mori, N., Aoki, H., Matsushita, A., Uehara, M., Matsumoto, Takahashi, H., & Maeda, H. (1988). Effect of magnetic field and high pressure on the superconductivity of the new high-Tc oxide Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O. Japanese journal of applied physics, 27(4A), L600.
  12. parimita Swain, P., Sengottuvel, S., Patel, R., Mani, A., & Gireesan, K. (2020). A feasibility study to measure magnetocardiography (MCG) in unshielded environment using first order gradiometer. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 55, 101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101664
  13. Rath, A., Mishra, D., Panda, G., & Satapathy, S. C. (2022). An exhaustive review of machine and deep learning based diagnosis of heart diseases. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(25), 36069-36127.
  14. Van Leeuwen, P., Lange, S., Klein, A., Geue, D., & Grönemeyer, D. H. (2004). Dependency of magnetocardiographically determined fetal cardiac time intervals on gestational age, gender and postnatal biometrics in healthy pregnancies. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 4(1), 1-10.
  15. Wacker‐Gussmann, A., Strasburger, J. F., & Wakai, R. T. (2022). Contribution of fetal magnetocardiography to diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment of fetal arrhythmia. Journal of the American Heart Association, 11(15), e025224. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025224.