Improving Water Efficiency, Nutrients Utilization, and Maize Yield using Super Absorbent Polymers Combined with NPK during Water Deficit Conditions

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 29, 2023
https://doi.org/10.70436/nuijb.v2i02.40
Download
PDF 262
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 2 No. 02 (2023): June

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rashad Ahmad Sherzad
Habibrahim Shinwari
Noor Ali Noor
Bakht Munir Baber
Asmatullah Durani
Shafiqullah Aryan
Kifayatullah Kakar
Tariqullah Hashemi
Pitipong Thobunluepop
Ed Sarobol

Abstract

Background: The increasing global population poses a significant challenge, resulting in a scarcity of food resources on a global scale. Addressing this issue necessitates advancements in agricultural practices, particularly in drought-prone areas. Super absorbent polymers (SAPs) are crucial in improving crop production's water and nutrient utilization efficiency, making them highly relevant for drought-affected areas. Thus, this research aimed to assess the impact of SAPs, combined with manure and fertilizers, on the growth of maize (Zea mays) cv. Ts-1004.
Material and Methods: The experiment consisted of nine treatment groups, namely, T1 (Nitrogen, N), T2 (Potassium, K), T3 (Phosphorus, P), T4 (NPK), T5 (Compost), T6 (SAPs), T7 (NPK + Compost), T8 (NPK + SAPs), and T9 (Control). These treatments were evaluated under two water level conditions: well-watered (W1) and water-stressed (W2) in a greenhouse environment. The plants were subjected to water stress by maintaining soil moisture content at 20 – 25% during the knee height and flowering stages for 8 days.
Results: The results revealed that significantly (P < 0.05) higher values in ear girth, ear length, number of seeds per ear, and ear weight were observed in the T8 treatment compared to other treatments. Additionally, the T8 treatment exhibited the highest yield under well-watered and water-stressed conditions (3,274.4 kg/ha). The application of SAPs improved soil moisture content, leading to enhanced water use efficiency (24.53 kg/ha/mm) and harvest index. Moreover, SAPs positively influenced the concentration percentage of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg in roots, stems, leaves, and seeds, with T8 showing the highest values under water stress conditions.
Conclusion: These findings highlighted the effectiveness of SAPs in enhancing crop growth and productivity, particularly under water stress conditions. This approach will help farmers reduce water stress on crops.

Keywords

WUE, NUE, Harvest index, Water deficit condition, NPK, Compost, SAPs

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Sherzad, R. A., Shinwari, H., Noor, N. A., Baber, B. M., Durani, A., Aryan, S., Kakar, K., Hashemi, T., Thobunluepop, P., & Sarobol, E. (2023). Improving Water Efficiency, Nutrients Utilization, and Maize Yield using Super Absorbent Polymers Combined with NPK during Water Deficit Conditions. Nangarhar University International Journal of Biosciences, 2(02), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.70436/nuijb.v2i02.40

References

  1. Ahmadi, A., and Baker, D. A. (2001). The effect of water stress on the activities of key regulatory enzymes of the sucrose to starch pathway in wheat. Plant Growth Regul. 35, 81–91.
  2. Anjum, S. A., Wang, L. C., Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Xue, L. L., and Zou, C. M. (2011). Brassinolide application improves the drought tolerance in maize through modulation of enzymatic antioxidants and leaf gas exchange. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 197, 177–185.
  3. Asghar, A., A. Ali, W. Syed, M. Asif, T. Khaliq and A. Abid. (2010). Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea Mays L.) Cultivars Affected by NPK Application in Different Proportion. Pakistan Journal of Science. 62(4): 211-216.
  4. Asiimwe, G., Jaafar, H., Haidar, M., & Mourad, R. (2022). Soil Moisture or ET-Based Smart Irrigation Scheduling: A Comparison for Sweet Corn with Sap Flow Measurements. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 148(6), 04022017.
  5. Alam, S. M. (1999). Nutrient uptake by plants under stress conditions. Handbook of plant and crop stress, 2, 285-313.
  6. AbdAllah, A. M., Mashaheet, A. M., & Burkey, K. O. (2021). Super absorbent polymers mitigate drought stress in corn (Zea mays L.) grown under rainfed conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 254, 106946.
  7. Bossio, D.; Noble, A, Molden, D, Nangia, V. (2008). Land degradation and water productivity in agricultural landscapes. In Conserving land, protecting water, ed., Bossio, D, Geheb, K. Wallingford, UK: CABI; Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI); Colombo, Sri Lanka: CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food, pp.20-32.
  8. Bahamin, S., Koocheki, A., Mahallati, M. N., & Behashti, S. (2021). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on yield and nutrient efficiency indices in maize under drought stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 14(3), 675-690.
  9. Bista, D. R., Heckathorn, S. A., Jayawardena, D. M., Mishra, S., & Boldt, J. K. (2018). Effects of drought on nutrient uptake and the levels of nutrient-uptake proteins in roots of drought-sensitive and-tolerant grasses. Plants, 7(2), 28.
  10. Bruinsma, J. (2009). The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water, and crop yields need to increase by 2050, FAO, Rome, Italy.
  11. Fahad, S., Bajwa, A. A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S. A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A. & Huang, J. (2017). Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Frontiers in plant science, 1147.
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization. (FAO) World Summit on Food Security, Rome, 16–18 November, (2009).
  13. He, Y., Tian, Z., Ma, R., Liang, Y., Zhu, X., & Qu, L. (2023). Effects of superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) incorporated with organic and inorganic fertilizer on the water and nutrient retention of soil in rare earth mine tailing areas. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 1-12.
  14. Jaleel C.A., P. Manivannan, A. Wahid, M. Farooq, R. Somasundaram, R. Paneerselvam, (2009). Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11: 100-105.
  15. Jensen M.E. (1993). The impacts of irrigation and drainage on the environment. 5th Gulhati Memorial Lecture. 15th ICID Congress, The Hague, ICID, New Delhi.
  16. Karimi A, Noshadi M, Ahmadzadeh M. (2009). Effects of superabsorbent polymer (SAPs) on crop, soil water and irrigation interval. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 12: 415-420.
  17. Kaul J, kumar RS, Dass S. (2011). Varietal improvement in maize: development of single cross hybrids in India.
  18. Kim, J. Y., Mahe, A., Brangeon, J., and Prioul, J. L. (2000). A maize vacuolur Invertase, IVR2, is induced by water stress. Organ/tissue specificity and diurnal modulation of expression. Plant Physiol. 124, 71–84. Doi: 10.1104/pp.124.1.71.
  19. Kidist. (2013). Growth and productivity of maize as influenced by rate and time of nitrogen. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 9(4): 1920-1928.
  20. Khan, M. B., Hussain, M., Raza, A., Farooq, S., and Jabran, K. (2015). Seed priming with CaCl2 and ridge planting for improved drought resistance in maize. Turk. J. Agric. For. 39, 193–203.
  21. Khaliq, Abbasi and T. Hussain. (2006). Effects of Integrated Use of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources with Effective Microorganisms (Em) on Seed Cotton Yield in Pakistan.
  22. Khalili, M., Naghavi, M. R., Aboughadareh, A. P., & Rad, H. N. (2013). Effects of drought stress on yield and yield components in maize cultivars (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4(4), 809-812.
  23. Khadem, S. H., Rousta, M. J., Chorom, M., Khadem, S. A., & Kasraeyan, A. (2010). The effects of different rates of super absorbent polymers and manure on corn nutrient uptake. In Proceedings of the 19th world congress of soil science: soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane, Australia (Vol. 2, pp. 1-6).
  24. Krasnopeeva, E. L., Panova, G. G., & Yakimansky, A. V. (2022). Agricultural Applications of Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(23), 15134.
  25. Leport, L., Turner, N. C., French, R. J., Barr, M. D., Duda, R., and Davies, S. L. (2006). Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. Eur. J. Agron. 11, 279–291.
  26. Lija, M., A.O. Haruna and S. Kasim. (2014). Maize (Zea Mays L.) Nutrient Use Efficiency as Affected by Formulated Fertilizer with Clinoptilolite Zeolite.
  27. Lucas, A.C., Jorge, A., John, D.M. and Klaus, W. (2007). Large variation in whole-plant water-use efficiency among tropical tree species. New phytologist, 173: 294-305.
  28. Lauer, J. (2007). How do you manage a corn crop after stress? Field Crop. Res, 28, 28-46.
  29. Nurlaeny, N., Herdiyantoro, D., Putra, R. M., Ratuliami, N., Pratiwi, W. N., & Nurfadilah, F. S. (2021). Drought stress and K effects on contents of soil water and organic matter, CEC, exchangeable-K, yield and water productivity of sweet corn on Inceptisols. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.
  30. Niu, L., Wang, Z., Zhu, G., Yu, K., Li, G., & Long, H. (2022). Stable Soil Moisture Improves the Water Use Efficiency of Maize by Alleviating Short-Term Soil Water Stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13.
  31. Nielson, K.A., S.A. Langenecker and H. Garavan. (2002). Differences in the Functional Neuroanatomy of Inhibitory Control across the Adult Life Span. Psychol. Aging.
  32. Nwachukwu, O. And M. Ikeadigh. (2012). Water Use Efficiency and Nutrient Uptake of Maize as Affected by Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer. PAT. 8(1): 199-208.
  33. Orzeszyna H, Garlikowski D, Pawlowski A. (2006). Using of geocomposite with superabsorbent synthetic polymers as water retention element in vegetative layers. Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Science 20: 201-206.
  34. Pawlowski A, Lejcus K, Garlikowski D, Orezesyna H. (2009). Geocomposite with superabsorbent as an element improving water availability for plants on slopes. Geophys Res Lett 11: 1-2.
  35. Pimentel D, Berger B, Filiberto D, Newton. M,Wolfe B,Karabinakis E, Clark S, Poon E, Abbett E, Nandaopal S. (2004).Water Resources, Agriculture, and the Environment. Ithaca (NY): New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University. Environmental Biology Report 04-1.
  36. Rafiei F, Nourmohammadi G, Chokan R, Kashani A, Haidari H.(2013). Investigation of superabsorbent polymer usage on maize under water stress. Global Journal of Medicinal Plant Research 1: 82-87.
  37. Rosegrant M.W. and CAI. (2002). Global water demand and supply projections: Results and prospects to 2025. Water Intern, 27: 170-182.
  38. Rucker, K. S, Kvien, C. K., Holbrook, C. C., and Hook, J. E. (1995). Identification of peanut genotypes with improved drought avoidance traits. Peanut Sci. 24, 14–18.
  39. Sarobol, E., T.Pakokton and S.Chowchong. (2003). the anaerobic protein of maize. Cell 20: 761-767 under the drought conditions.pp.165-172. In proceeding of the 31st National corn and sorghum Research Conference 2003, May 11-15, 2003, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
  40. Sarvas, M., P. Pavlenda and E. Takacova. (2007). Effect of hydrogel application on survival and growth of pine grainling in reclamations.
  41. Singh, J.B., Pradeep, B. and Yadava, R.B. (2007). Water Relations Current Science. Current Science, 93(1).
  42. Schimel, J., Balser, T. C., and Wallenstein, M. (2007). Microbial stress response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88, 1386–1394.
  43. Singh, S. K., Suman, S. N., & Kumari, A. (2018). Performance of autumn maize crop as influenced by seaweed saps. IJCS, 6(2), 2341-2345.
  44. Tarighaleslami, M., Zarghami, R., Boojar, M. M. A., & Oveysi, M. (2012). Effects of drought stress and different nitrogen levels on morphological traits of proline in leaf and protein of corn seed (Zea mays L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 12, 49-56.
  45. Taiz, L., and Zeiger, E. (2006). Plant Physiology, 4th Edn. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates Inc Publishers.
  46. Thompson, Helen. (2012). Food science deserves a place at the table – US agricultural research chief aims to raise the profile of farming and nutrition science. Nature, July 12.
  47. Wahid, A., and Close, T. J. (2007). Expression of dehydrins under heat stress and their relationship with water relations of sugarcane leaves. Biol. Plant. 51, 104–109.
  48. Wang, J. G.H., et al, Effect of soil moisture-based furrow irrigation scheduling on melon (Cucumis melo L.) yield and quality in an arid region of Northwest China Agric. Water Manag. 179 .(2017), pp. 167-176.
  49. Woldesenbet, M. And A. Haileyesus. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizar on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Maize (Zea Mays L.) in Decha District, Southwestern Etiopia.
  50. Wei, L. C., Zhang, H. P., Wang, X. L., & Zhang, S. Q. (2023). Improved Water Use of the Maize Soil–Root–Shoot System under the Integrated Effects of Organic Manure and Plant Density. Agronomy, 13(4), 1172.
  51. Yazdani F, Allahdadi I, Akbari GA. (2007). Impact of superabsorbent polymer on yield and growth analysis of Soybean (Glycine max L.) under drought stress condition. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10: 4190-4196.
  52. Zhao, T. J., et al. (2006). Regulating the drought-responsive element (DRE)-mediated signaling pathway by synergic functions of trans-active and Trans in active DRE binding factors in Brassica napus. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 10752–10759.
  53. Zinselmeier, C., Jeong, B. R., and Boyer, J. S. (1999). Starch and the control of kernel number in Maize at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 121, 25–35.
  54. Zheng, H., Mei, P., Wang, W., Yin, Y., Li, H., Zheng, M, & Cui, Z. (2023). Effects of super absorbent polymer on crop yield, water productivity and soil properties: A global meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 282, 108290.

Most read articles by the same author(s)